NSRC: National Sexuality Resource Center

  • Join Us

    Blog, talk back, and get connected in the Dialogues Network.

Follicular Transgressions

Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:18:24pm   ►by Chris Warfield   ►

Several times over the past year I’ve come across news articles pertaining to boys’ hair. One was about a 4-year-old boy who was suspended from preschool for having long hair. After a two-month long battle between the school district and the boy’s parents, the child was allowed to attend school again so long as he wore his hair braided against his scalp so that no hair was “touching his collar.” In a similar case another boy in Texas was suspended for refusing to cut his shoulder-length locks. In both cases the school administrations justified the suspensions by citing dress code policies that specifically disallowed long hair on boys, but not girls.

 

Interestingly, there are no news stories about girls being suspended from school for having short hair and the reason for that is simply because school dress codes do not regulate the length (or lack thereof) of girls’ hair. While girls and women may face ridicule for having stereotypically “masculine” hairstyles (think Britney Spears’s shaved head incident), such gender transgressions do not necessitate formal rules and regulations. And, even in areas where such rules do not exist, men and boys who transgress gender norms are subject to far more dire social consequences than girls and women who do the same. The story of Roy Jones, a 17-month-old (months, not years!) who was beaten to death in August by his stepfather, really epitomizes this. When questioned by police, Jones’ stepfather said explained that he was trying to “toughen” the child up: "I was trying to make him act like a boy instead of a little girl. I never struck that kid that hard before. A one-time mistake, and I am going to do 20 years." This story also made me think of the case of Larry King, a 15-year-old high school student who wore high heels and makeup and was murdered by a fellow classmate in 2008.

           

While girls are also often tormented for not conforming to gender norms, they are allowed a much wider range of gender expression than boys. Girls may play sports, yet it is unacceptable for boys to want to participate in ballet. Girls may wear pants, but boys who wear dresses are subject to derision. It is all right to name a girl Taylor, but nobody would dare name a son Mary. What is ironic is that the system that allows girls greater gender expression does so because it is a system in which women are devalued. For a man to wear a dress, dance ballet, be an interior decorator, or have sex with other men is for him to behave femininely. In essence, a man who does any of these things has lowered himself to the social position of a woman; he reminds other “normal” men that gender is flexible, not a biological given, thus inciting their fears and insecurities which are expressed in the form of gender policing.

 

Comments

Hair, who knew

I completely agree with your assessment of the situation. I've always questioned the gender binary and the way it plays out in schools but thank you for exposing me to the realities in regards to hair. You're right, there is typically no restriction for girls' hair length and the fact that boys are disallowed from wearing their hair long should be questioned more--especially in our school system. To me, the gender policing is just another result of patriarchy in our society. For certain men to present themselves more femininely than others is a threat to the dynamics of power through patriarchy. It's just another reminder of how prominent the gender divide is even to this day.

Nico Placido on Sep 24, 2010 02:22pm

boy cheerleader

I'm racking my brain for where I read this, but recently there was a story about a boy --maybe in middle school?--who was beaten up by other boys for being a cheerleader and ended up with a broken arm. His mother was extemely upset that school officials weren't doing more to protect her son. This really exemplifies the narrow roles of men. It's still acceptable for people to look the other way or claim "boys will be boys" when it comes to bullying meant to enforce gender norms.

rebecca dyer on Sep 30, 2010 04:04pm

Agree and disagree

I agree with your assessment of gender bending and the emphasis on male fashion and style that is certainly more regulated than girls. Maybe this is due to our value placed upon men in this culture - where attributes such as "being tough" and "aggressive" are seen as positive attributes. On the flip-side, I think girls are often held back because of gender norms in other ways. Women have a harder time moving up in their jobs and are often demonized if they look "too masculine". In other words, a girl can have a cute little pixie cut but if she wears big combat boots and has a buzz cut she is seen as not "taking care of herself" or as a "butch dyke" (a double whammy). I had never heard of the Roy Jones story! That is crazy...it really makes me sad for society. Anyway, thanks for sharing, awesome post

Vanessa Torres on Oct 02, 2010 07:21pm