NSRC: National Sexuality Resource Center

  • Join Us

    Blog, talk back, and get connected in the Dialogues Network.

Mama & Papa, sitting in a tree...

Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:55:09pm   ►by Charlie DeVries   ►

     

    It's a curious affair, this whole sex thing.

    It seems to be, like so many things, an activity reserved for youth. Oh, those carefree days of vim, vigor, & virility! Those days when we were young & beautiful, lazing around in the summer sun, eating grapes & getting fanned by palm--hey wait a minute!

    It is misguided to think that everyone loses not only the physical capacity but also the general drive to have sex as they age. It is true that some people may have less interest or less capacity, but this is not universally true, and seems to be decreasingly 'true' as time goes on--whether that be a general cultural shift, the aging of the 'free love' baby boomers, or the invention of a bevy of medications to overcome erectile dysfunction.

    When I talk to medical students about the importance of sexual history-taking, I emphasize the fact that, as much as they might not like to think about it, the truth of the matter is that none of them (or almost none, given the wonders of technological advancement in reproductive options) would be there without sex. So yes, that means that your parents did it, your grandparents did it, and all their ancestors before them did it. And thank heavens they did, or you wouldn't be here today, making that squick face that so many people do when they think about this.

    So why does it freak people out so much to think about it?

    This concerns me a great deal, not only because I'm a sex nerd who thinks that healthy sexuality is a woven into the deepest parts of humanity, but also because I'm a health nerd who also spends a lot of time thinking about disease burden, transmission, morbidity & mortality.

    For a lot of folks, safer sex is all about keeping the babies from happening, so once that's not an issue anymore, they give the old heave ho to contraception/barriers & never look back, delighting in their newfound freedom. Unfortunately, they're not out of the woods yet.

    The data on STDs in this population is scarce, but in 2005, the CDCfound that people 50 & older accounted for 15% of new HIV/AIDS cases--that's incidence, not prevalence! That same year, they found that this population made up 25% living with HIV/AIDS. And with the disease becoming more of a chronic condition, it is quite likely these rates will only increase without the proper education & prevention efforts. Beyond HIV, the data is even less available--but one study in England found that rates of STDs in this population had nearly doubled between 1996-2003. On top of that, STD symptoms often mimic the natural progress of aging--so if no one's asking them about their sexual history or screening them for STDs, there may be significantly more time in between infection & diagnosis, & therefore, potentially accelerated aging and increased mortality.

    Not to go all doom & gloom on you there, but it's kind of scary, especially since older adults are almost always excluded from risk reduction clinical trial research, and there's a dearth of educational materials & population-specific prevention efforts being made.

    So yeah--your old folks might be having sex. And yeah, that might cause a little heave ho in your digestive tract. But what if they're at risk & don't know it? What if they get infected & no one catches it? Is it worth the risk?

    Maybe it's time for you to sit them down & have 'The Talk.'

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Comments

    Generational genuflections...

    Wow, Charlie! Thanks so much for making me consider the public health angle on sexuality issues for older peoples which I'd never really considered before. Thinking about older folks' sexuality, the first thing that comes to my mind is the way we sometimes see aging as regressing towards childhood, both physically and mentally, as if a life-span were an inverted parabola with a peak of optimization (of sexually or just of life as a concept in general). It's no wonder then to me that we aim to desexualize both children and elderly folks, in completely different fashions. If proscribing an asexual nature onto a child in contemporary American culture necessitates (at least within current dominant discourse) creating systems of 'protecting' a child, by what mechanisms of asexualizing older folks occur to make us feel that our grandparents must NOT be 'doing it?'

    Michael McNamara on Oct 27, 2009 08:47pm

    Rachel Maddow's commercials

    I was aware of the continued sexuality of older folks as a result of the numerous erectile dysfunction medication advertisements during Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow. However, I am struck by the data you presented about STD's in this population. It seems that the ED companies have figured out how to market the pleasure of sex, but that there is a real need for education around disease protection.

    Kristina Kifer on Oct 28, 2009 08:28am

    re: Generational genuflections...

    Hi Michael- Thanks for your reply. It's definitely something interesting that a lot of folks don't think about--not only because of the myths of asexuality & lack of risk, but it is my suspicion that if we even consider the thought that they might be sexually active, we think that because they're our elders & have all this life experience, that they should know better! I think you make a good point, but I also think that the bulk of the resistance comes from the idea that 'old' people have no *need* for sex. It's something you do when you're young & vibrant, full of hormones & capable bodies (there's a lot of asexualization of younger persons with disabilities as well). I think shame also ties into it a lot--whereas for younger people it's a 'biological process/impulse,' without that physical drive, it again becomes relegated to being 'dirty' and without any justification.

    Charlie D on Oct 29, 2009 08:29am